亚米精選

Are the ingredients really the same?

Nivea Blue Tank is an affordable alternative toLamerThe idea is believed to have passed Everyone's ears! But is it just me who really tried it? (Fortunately, 99 bought a body lotion and said it was a good deal )

















From the perspective of use, the same taste may be the biggest similarity…………Nivea is very difficult to push away, leaving me oily, let alone absorbed. Later, I saw that it must be emulsified before use....emmmmI really feel better, from a face to a layer . In comparison, lamer is quickly absorbed by the skin, and the face quickly gave feedback, soft hahahaha. Nivea's words are actually almost the same when you wake up the next day, but in the long run, I feel that Nivea can only be a flawless effect, wipe your hands and wipe your handsjiojioYou can leave it for a while.



(Picture from Google)


In terms of ingredients, Nivea's first5 main ingredients are all in < /span>Lamercan be found, of whichParaffin(Liquid Paraffin) and Glycerin(Glycerin) are alsoLamer The first 5 of (the ingredient ranking order is the proportion of the product) from largest to smallest). AndLamerbefore5The name ingredients also have this very cheapPetrolatu (Vaseline).


ButLamer's first ingredient, and the main active ingredient, is its most The proud oneAlgea extract(seaweed) extract, pressLamer< /span>My own statement is that kelp is mixed with other ingredients and fermented for three months. Worked or not, but this ingredient turnedlamercream into an active botanical-based cream and topped the list . This is what Nivea is essentially irreplaceable.


The visible ingredients and texture are so much worse, but what about the invisible technology behind it?



They all useW/O(water-in-oil) process, The texture is very similar, and the moisturizing strength is also very close, it can be said that they are all high moisturizing creams.


If you only need moisturizing, the small blue can is enough to replace.

If you have high moisturizing, partial repair, anti-allergic, and anti-aging oil control, all these needs, then there is no way to replace the small blue pot La Mer, it is reasonable to use so many miscellaneous creams, I found that nothing can replace itlamer.


In fact, if you replace it at an affordable price, it is to replace one or several functions of each product. If you only need some functions, there is a high probability that you can find a replacement. But isn't the big name just expensive, technically it allows you to achieve multiple effects with one product?


END🔚

translate Show Original
亚米精選

成分相似真的一样吗?

妮维雅蓝罐是Lamer的平价替代这个说法相信已经传入了大家的耳朵!但是真的去试一下的是不是只有我呀(还好99分买个身体乳还说很划算的)

















从使用感上面来说,味道一样可能是最大的相同点了…………妮维雅非常难推开,糊我一脸油,更不要说吸收了。后来看到说要乳化过才能用…emmmm的确感觉是好一点了,从一脸变成一层了。比较下来lamer很快就被皮肤吸收,而且脸很快就给了反馈,软软的哈哈哈哈哈。妮维雅的话第二天起来其实也差不多了,但是长期下来觉得妮维雅只能是一个无功无过的效果,擦手手擦jiojio还可以留一下。



(图自谷歌)


成分上来说,妮维雅的前5个主要成分,都在Lamer找得到,其中Paraffin(液体石蜡)和Glycerin(甘油)也是Lamer的前5个(成分排名顺序就是产品的占比顺序由大到小)。而且Lamer5名成分里也有这个个很便宜的Petrolatu(凡士林)。


但是Lamer的首位成分,也是主要的活性成分,是它最自豪的那个Algea extract(海藻)提取物,按Lamer自己的说法,是海带混合了其它一些成分,发酵三个月得到的。不管有没有发挥效果,但是这个成分把lamer面霜的变成了基于活性植物成分的面霜,并且高居榜首。这就是妮维雅从本质上都不可取代。


看得见的成分和质感就差了那么多,背后看不见的技术工艺呢?



它们都使用了W/O(油包水)的工艺,质地很像,而且保湿强度也很接近,可以说都是高保湿面霜中的大拿了。


如果你只有保湿的需求,小蓝罐足够平替。

如果你有高保湿偏修护抗敏,还要抗衰控油,所有这些需求,那么小蓝罐没有办法平替掉 La Mer,讲道理用了那么多杂七杂八的面霜,我发现啥都不能替代lamer


其实平价替代的话,就是替代每一个产品的某一个或者几个功能,如果你只要某些功效,很大概率都能找到平替。但是大牌不就是贵在技术上能让你用一个产品达到多重效果吗?


结束🔚